Are generative artificial intelligence models built on stolen creative work? The first two judgments addressing this question ...

Don’t look at this as a win for the tech companies. This is at best guidance for the plaintiffs," said Jason L. Haas, a ...

Artists whose work was allegedly used by Midjourney Inc. to train its generative AI product aren’t entitled to access all datasets used in the training process during discovery in their copyright ...

Furthermore, the plaintiffs failed to show that Meta’s copying negatively impacted the market for their works, a key factor in copyright infringement claims ... while Disney and Universal have taken ...

Mooser was careful not to downplay that these concerns about generative AI were a big part of what plunged Hollywood into a ...

This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use.

The YouTuber was buried in criticism after announcing the AI tool, which he said "literally feels like cheating." ...

AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI only need to pay for cheap sources of copyrighted work to train their models, per a ...

Two federal judges in the same courthouse came to different opinions on whether AI firms are breaching copyrights, signaling ...

Copyrighted books can be used to train artificial intelligence models without authors’ consent, a federal judge ruled Monday.

The ruling in a case involving Amazon-backed Anthropic lends credibility to the notion that AI video generators that could ...

Getty Images dropped its primary claims of copyright infringement against Stability AI on Wednesday at London’s High Court, ...