AI生成代码贡献的负担——在使用Git版本控制系统的开发者中被称为拉取请求——已成为开源维护者面临的一个重大问题。评估来自AI机器人的冗长、大量、通常质量低下的提交需要时间,而维护者(通常是志愿者)宁愿将时间花在其他任务上。对垃圾提交的担忧——无论来自人类还是AI模型——已经变得足够普遍,以至于GitHub最近召开了讨论来解决这个问题。
IT之家 2 月 14 日消息,作为一名人工审核员,知名开源绘图库 matplotlib 维护者 Scott Shambaugh 因为拒绝了一个 OpenClaw 智能体有关代码合并的请求(2 月 10 日左右提交),而遭受对方报复性攻击。
AI agents lack independent agency but can still seek multistep, extrapolated goals when prompted. Even if some of those prompts include AI-written text (which may become more of an issue in the ...
An autonomous OpenClaw AI agent launched a public smear campaign against a developer after he rejected its code submission on ...
This python crash course book on Amazon is great for beginners who want to learn programming. It teaches Python basics step-by-step and includes exercises to help you practice. You’ll build real ...
An AI agent got nasty after its pull request got rejected. Can open-source development survive autonomous bot contributors?
Sign of the times: An AI agent autonomously wrote and published a personalized attack article against an open-source software ...
Daniel Stenberg, founder and lead developer of curl, has been dealing with AI slop bug reports for the past two years and ...
Boing Boing on MSN
An AI agent published a hit piece on the developer who rejected it
Scott Shambaugh maintains matplotlib, a Python plotting library downloaded about 130 million times a month. Like many open source projects, matplotlib now requires human review of all submissions ...
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果